i (i) wrote,

dave's campaign finance reform proposal:

allow candidates to raise and spend as much money as they like in the primary process, but as soon as it is over, give them a set amount each of public funding and limit their spending to that amount.

winning the republican primary would probably take more money than winning the democratic, but republicans have more money. once candidates have won the support of their constituency, they should be on an equal footing financially.

public funding would be predicated on numbers of supporters. if you pass a certain threshold, you get it. it might work to have tiers of funding to facilitate the participation of smaller parties. the top two parties in terms of popular support get $20 million, for example, and the next two get $5 million, and the next two, $1 million.
  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded