i (i) wrote,

ari fleischer was on npr this morning talking about the arab press organizations who allegedly knew in advance about attacks on us targets in iraq. when pressed about evidence of their complicity, he said, "i don't have it right here in front of me, but secrectary rumsfeld has said it exists" or something like that. hellooo, at every stage of this war, the bush administration has lied to us about "evidence". why should we believe them now? al jazeera spent months getting a reporter into the rebel group, and in the end happened to be there at the time of an attack. if anything, we should look on them as a good source of intelligence, since we obviously are unable to infiltrate these groups ourselves.

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded